Study of three kinds of primary immunization schedules with poliovirus vaccine / 中华预防医学杂志

Objective: To compare the immunogenicity of three kinds immunization programs with poliovirus vaccine. Methods: Healthy infants aged 2 months or over were selected and divided into three groups by complete randomization method. Basic immunization with Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine(sIPV) and bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine(bOPV) were completed. Three kinds of basic immunization procedures were 1sIPV+2bOPV,2sIPV+1bOPV and 3sIPV, respectively.Two qualified serums that before basic immunization and 28-42 days later were collected, and measured the poliovirus neutralizing antibody with microcell neutralization method. To compare the difference by analysis of variance, rank test and χ2 test. Results: After the basic immunization, 205 subjects of the positive conversion rate of poliovirus neutralizing antibodies of types Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲwere all higher than 97.00%, and the positive rates were all higher than 98.00%, the geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibody was significantly higher than that before basic immunization in three groups.There were significant differences in the positive rate and GMT before and after basic immunization of typeⅠ, Ⅱand Ⅲ in the three (P<0.05). The highest GMT in three groups after basic immunization were all typeⅠ, followed by type Ⅲ, and the lowest in type Ⅱ. The GMT of type Ⅱin 2sIPV+1bOPV and 3sIPV groups were both higher than that in sIPV+2bOPV group. Conclution: After three kinds of basic immunization, the poliovirus neutralizing antibodies of serum were all at high levels in three groups, which could form an effective immune barrier against poliovirus. The immunogenicity of three kinds of basic immunization programs were all well, but there were certain differences of neutralizing antibodies among three kinds basic immunization programs. The immunogenicity in 2sIPV+1bOPV and 3sIPV groups against typeⅡpoliovirus were better than that in 1sIPV+2bOPV group.

Análisis económico de las vacunas del primer año de vida con componente pertussis en el contexto de la ini-ciativa mundial de erradicación de la poliomielitis en Argentina / Vaccination in children under 1 year with pertussis component in the context of the global initiative for the eradication of poliomyelitis in Argentina: economic analysis

INTRODUCCIÓN: La Iniciativa Mundial de Erradicación de la Polio promueve la introducción de vacuna de polio inactivada (IPV) en sus programas, con la posterior retirada de Sabin (bOPV). OBJETIVO: Construir un modelo de económico que compare diferentes esquemas de vacunación para la prevención de polio y tosferina en el primer año de vida. Material y MÉTODOS: Análisis de cuatro escenarios de vacunación del esquema primario para Argentina, en base a los precios de las vacunas, costos del programa y reactogenicidad de vacuna celular o acelular para Bordetella pertussis: - Escenario 1 (caso base): dos dosis de IPV, una dosis de bOPV y tres dosis de vacuna pentavalente (DTwP-HB-Hib); - Escenario 2: tres dosis IPV y de pentavalente; - Escenario 3: tres dosis de hexavalente (DTaP-HepB-IPV-Hib); - Escenario 4: dos dosis de hexavalente más una dosis de pentavalente más IPV. RESULTADOS: El costo incremental en base al escenario 1 fue de USD 3.716.671; 19.696.668 y 14.383.341 para los escenarios 2, 3 y 4, respectivamente. Para la reactogenicidad, la diferencia fue de USD -14.178.240 comparado el caso base con el escenario 3. DISCUSIÓN: La inversión de incorporación de full IPV y costos asociados se modifica según tipo de vacuna y reactogenicidad asociada al componente B. pertussis.

BACKGROUND: Global Polio Eradication Initiative promotes the introduction of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in its programs, with withdrawal of Sabin (bOPV). There is no an economic analysis of the investment related to the incorporation of IPV vaccines together with a whole cell Bordetella pertussis vaccine or combined with acellular hexavalent. AIM: An economic model that compares different vaccination schemes for the prevention of polio and pertussis in the first year of life was carried out. METHODS: Four vaccination scenarios for the primary scheme based on Argentina demographic and costs data were developed: - Scenario 1 (base case): two doses of IPV, one dose of bOPV and three doses of pentavalent (DTwP-HepB-Hib) vaccine; - Scenario 2: three doses of IPV plus three doses of pentavalent; - Scenario 3: three doses of hexavalent; - Scenario 4: two doses of hexavalent plus one dose of pentavalent plus IPV. RESULTS: The incremental cost based on scenario 1 was USD 3.716.671; 19.696.668 and 14.383.341 for scenarios 2, 3 and 4 respectively. In terms of reactogenicity savings was -14.178.240 compared base case with scenario 3. DISCUSSION: Full IPV introduction investment and costs associated were modified according to the type of vaccine and reactogenicity related with the B. pertussis component.

Poliomielitis, una historia de inicio triste y final feliz / Poliomyelitis, a story with a sad beginning and a happy ending

Se desarrollan los principales elementos históricos en el estudio y la lucha contra la poliomielitis, su aislamiento por Karl Landsteiner en 1909, la primera vacuna con virus muerto (Jonas Salk, 1955), la segunda vacuna con virus vivo atenuado (Albert Sabin, 1961) y la reducción paulatina de la polio en todo el mundo, hasta llegar a menos de 200 casos al año (virus salvaje)(AU)

The main historical events in the study and fight against polio are shown, its isolation by Karl Landsteiner in 1909, the development of the first vaccine with dead virus (Jonas Salk, 1955), the second vaccine with live attenuated virus (Albert Sabin, 1961) and the gradual reduction of polio worldwide, reaching less than 200 cases a year (wild virus)(AU)

Prevalence of neutralizing antibodies against poliovirus 1, 2, and 3 in healthcare professionals aged 20-50 years / Prevalência de anticorpos neutralizantes contra poliovírus 1, 2 e 3 em profissionais de saúde de 20 a 50 anos de idade

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the prevalence of neutralizing antibodies against poliovirus (PV1, PV2, and PV3) in blood samples of healthcare professionals aged 20 to 50 years. Methods: Health professionals who serve children at Darcy Vargas Children's Hospital and the Department of Pediatrics of Irmandade da Santa Casa de São Paulo. The sample size was calculated at 323 participants. The Mantel-Haenszel chi-square was used to verify differences between groups. The neutralization reaction detected human poliovirus antibodies. For susceptible individuals, vaccination with the inactivated+triple acellular polio vaccine was performed, and neutralizing antibodies were re-dosed after one week. Results: 333 professionals were studied - 92.8% were immune to poliovirus 1, 86.5% to poliovirus 2, and 63.3% to poliovirus 3; 37% had titers less than 1:8 for any serotype, 5;1% had titers below 1:8 for all three. Vaccination with inactivated polio vaccine was performed for susceptible participants, and neutralizing antibodies were dosed after one week, showing increased titers for all polioviruses. Conclusions: Despite the detection of a significant percentage of individuals with low poliovirus antibody titer, the challenge with vaccination demonstrated immune response compatible with poliovirus immunity.

RESUMO Objetivo: Descrever a prevalência de anticorpos neutralizantes contra poliovírus (tipos 1, 2 e 3) em amostra de sangue de profissionais de saúde com idade de 20 a 50 anos. Métodos: Profissionais de saúde que atendem crianças do Hospital Infantil Darcy Vargas e do Departamento de Pediatria da Irmandade da Santa Casa de São Paulo. O tamanho da amostra foi de 323 participantes. Os anticorpos contra poliovírus humanos foram detectados pela reação de neutralização. Para os indivíduos suscetíveis, foram administradas vacina para poliomielite inativada+tríplice e nova dosagem de anticorpos neutralizantes após uma semana. Utilizou-se o teste do qui-quadrado de Mantel-Haenszel para verificar as diferenças entre os grupos. Resultados: Foram estudados 333 profissionais - 92,8% eram imunes ao poliovírus 1; 86,5%, ao poliovírus 2; 63,57%, ao poliovírus 3; 37% apresentaram títulos inferiores a 1:8 para qualquer sorotipo; 5,1% tinham títulos abaixo de 1:8 para os três. Após a vacinação dos suscetíveis, houve elevação dos títulos para todos os poliovírus. Conclusões: Apesar da detecção de percentual significativo de indivíduos com baixo título de anticorpos para poliovírus, o desafio da vacinação demonstrou resposta imune robusta compatível.

Estado actual de la poliomielitis en Latinoamérica

Resumen La vacuna oral contra el poliovirus (OPV) ha sido fundamental en controlar la epidemia de poliomielitis, y destaca por su seguridad, eficacia, facilidad de administración oral y bajo costo. Sin embargo, a pesar de estas ventajas, al tratarse de una vacuna con virus vivos atenuados, existe la posibilidad de mutaciones que confieran neurovirulencia. Por ende, es importante la vigilancia de parálisis flácida aguda (PFA), ya sea asociada a las vacunas atenuadas (VAPP) o a los virus derivados de vacunas (VDPV). En esta revisión presentamos datos importantes de Latinoamérica en los últimos años, donde se revisan los datos de VDPV de transmisión comunitaria, de origen ambiguo y asociadas con inmunodeficiencias. Debido a la presencia de VDPV, es importante fortalecer el sistema de vigilancia epidemiológica por PFA, con datos muy inferiores a los recomendados en estos últimos años en las Américas. Adicionalmente, es fundamental mejorar las coberturas vacunales para reducir la cantidad de lactantes en riesgo de adquirir poliomielitis. En consecuencia, presentamos las tasas de cobertura vacunal con la vacuna inactivada contra el poliovirus (IPV) en la región y analizamos los programas de vacunación contra la poliomielitis en concordancia con las recomendaciones de la Sociedad Latinoamericana de Infectología Pediátrica (SLIPE; mínimo 3 dosis de IPV) y del Grupo de Expertos en Asesoramiento Estratégico (SAGE) sobre Inmunización de la OMS (mínimo 2 dosis de IPV). El estudio concluye con recomendaciones de los autores para el cambio de OPV a uso exclusivo de IPV, para aumentar las coberturas vacunales y para reforzar la vigilancia por PFA en la región.

Abstract Oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has been instrumental in controlling the polio epidemic, and stands out for its safety, efficacy, ease of oral administration, and low cost. However, despite these advantages, as it is a live attenuated virus vaccine, there is the possibility of mutations that confer neurovirulence. Therefore, surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) is important, whether associated with live vaccines (VAPP) or vaccine-derived viruses (VDPV). In this review we present important data from Latin America in recent years, where data on VDPV of community transmission, of ambiguous origin and associated with immunodeficiencies are reviewed. Due to the presence of VDPV, it is important to strengthen the epidemiological surveillance system for AFP, with data much lower than those recommended in recent years in the Americas. Additionally, it is essential to improve vaccination coverage to reduce the number of infants at risk of acquiring poliomyelitis. Consequently, we present the vaccination coverage rates with the inactivated vaccine against poliovirus (IPV) in the region and analyze the vaccination programs against poliomyelitis in accordance with the recommendations of the Latin American Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (SLIPE; minimum 3 doses of IPV) and the WHO Strategic Advisory Expert Group (SAGE) on Immunization (minimum 2 doses of IPV). The study concludes with recommendations from the authors for the change from OPV to exclusive use of IPV, to increase vaccination coverage and to strengthen surveillance for AFP in the region.

Padronização de teste para quantificar anticorpos anti-poliovírus utilizando vírus vacinal / Standardization of a test for quantifying the antibodies against poliovirus using the vaccine virus

A poliomielite é uma doença endêmica no Afeganistão e no Paquistão, apesar dos esforços para ser erradicada, representando uma ameaça para outros países principalmente devido às viagens internacionais. A Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) tem como objetivo erradicar a poliomielite causada pelo poliovírus selvagem no mundo. O requisito essencial para a erradicação da poliomielite é a eliminação da cepa do poliovírus selvagem, que é empregada no teste padrão-ouro. Com o intuito de auxiliar na erradicação do poliovírus selvagem, o objetivo deste estudo foi modificar o teste padrão-ouro usando o poliovírus derivado da vacina oral atenuada. Foram testados 63 soros pelo ensaio de neutralização utilizando-se antígenos vacinais. A concordância do sorotipo 1 (k=0,74) foi considerada substancial, enquanto o sorotipo 2 (k=1,00) e sorotipo 3 (k= 0,95) foram consideradas quase perfeitas. A sensibilidade dos testes de soroneutralização utilizando os sorotipos 1, 2 e 3 foi de 94,83%, 100,00% e 100,00%, respectivamente. Em conclusão, o ensaio com antígenos vacinais pode ser usado como procedimento laboratorial seguro, especialmente em estudos de vigilância em larga escala. (AU)

Poliomyelitis is an endemic disease in Afghanistan and Pakistan in despite of the efforts to eradicate it, and it represents a threat to other countries mainly due to the international trips. The World Health Organization (WHO) aims at eradicating the polio disease worldwide. An essential requirement for eradicating the poliomyelitis is the elimination of the wild poliovirus strain, which is employed in the gold standard test. As a support for the eradication of wild poliovirus, the present study aimed at modifying the gold standard test by using poliovirus derived from the oral attenuated vaccine. Sixty-three sera samples were tested by neutralization assay using vaccine antigens. The degree of agreement of the serotype 1 (k=0.74) was considered substantial, while the serotype 2 (k=1.00) and 3 (k= 0.95) showed almost perfect agreement. The sensitivity of serotypes 1, 2 and 3 was 94.83%, 100.00% and 100.00%, respectively. In conclusion, the assay with the vaccine antigens can be used as a safe application, especially for large-scale surveillance studies. (AU)

Remarks on the possibility of introducing the fractionated dose of the inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine in the Latin American Child Immunization Schedule

Abstract Given that the last notified case of poliomyelitis due to wild poliovirus type 2 was in 1999, in 2012, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) of the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the withdrawal of the type 2 component of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the introduction of a bivalent OPV (bOPV) in all countries by 2016. WHO recommended also that the withdrawal should be preceded by the introduction of at least one dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in routine immunization schedules. The introduction of IPV prior to the change of the bOPV in 2016 to trivalent OPV (tOPV) was based on the concept of ensuring that a substantial proportion of the population would be protected against type 2 polio after the removal of the type 2 OPV. However, the world's two producers of IPV (Bilthoven Biologicals and Sanofi) have faced problems in the production of this vaccine and therefore reported a reduction of the global supply of IPV. In response to the potential shortage of IPV, at a meeting held on March 10 2017, the SAGE and Technical Advisory Group (TAG) of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) urged the countries in the Latin American region to replace the routine administration of the full doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV-C) in the immunization schedule (administered by intramuscular route), administering a fraction of the full dose in two intradermal shots (IPV-f). The possibility of this strategy was analyzed by opinion leaders convened by the Paraguayan Society of Pediatrics with the support of the Latin American Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (SLIPE) and Latin American Association of Pediatrics (ALAPE). This document presents the results of the discussion.

Consideraciones referente a la posibilidad de introducir la dosis fraccionada de la vacuna antipoliomielitis inactivada en el calendario de Inmunizaciones del Niño Latinoamericano / Remarks on the possibility of the introduction of fractionated dose of the inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine in the Latin American Child Immunization Schedule

As last notified case of poliomyelitis due to wild poliovirus type 2 was 1999, in 2012, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) of the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the withdrawal of the type 2 component of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the introduction of bivalent OPV (bOPV) in all countries by 2016. WHO recommended also that the withdrawal should be preceded by the introduction of at least one dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in routine immunization schedules. The introduction of IPV prior to the change of the bOPV in 2016 to trivalent OPV (tOPV) was based on the concept of ensuring that a substantial proportion of the population would be protected against type 2 polio after the removal of the type 2 OPV. However, the world's two producers of IPV (Bilthoven Biologicals and Sanofi) have faced problems in the production of this vaccine and therefore reported reduction in IPV global supply. In response to the possible shortage of IPV, the SAGE and Technical Adviser Group (TAG) of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), in the meeting of March 10, 2017, has urged that countries in the Latinamerican region should replace the routine administration of the full doses of polio inactivated vaccine (IPV-C) in the immunization schedule (administered by intramuscular route) by the administration of a fraction of the full dose in two shots by intradermal route (IPV-f). The possibility of this strategy was analyzed by leaders of opinions gathered by the call of the Paraguayan Pediatric Society with the support of the Latin American Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (SLIPE) and Latin American Association of Pediatrics (ALAPE). The results of the discussion are presented in this document.

Síndrome de Nicolau por la administración de la vacuna séxtuple intramuscular en un lactante de 6 meses / Nicolau syndrome induced by intramuscular injection of a hexavalent vaccine in a 6-month-old girl

El síndrome de Nicolau, también conocido como embolia cutis medicamentosa o dermatitis livedoide, es una reacción cutánea infrecuente, caracterizada por una necrosis de la piel y los tejidos blandos de aparición súbita luego de la aplicación intramuscular de algunas drogas. Presentamos a un bebé de 6 meses de edad que, al recibir la tercera dosis de la vacuna séxtuple intramuscular, desarrolló una lesión necrótica con reticulado violáceo periférico en el sitio de aplicación. Se destaca la importancia del diagnóstico precoz a fin de instaurar un adecuado tratamiento y seguimiento para evitar complicaciones secundarias a la isquemia.

Nicolau syndrome, also known as embolia cutis medicamentosa or livedo-like dermatitis, is a sudden tissue necrosis, a rare complication of intramuscular injection of some drugs. We report a case of a 6-month-old girl who received intramuscularly the third dose of hexavalent vaccine (DTaP-HVB-IPV/HIb), and immediately presented a livedoid lesion around the injection site, progressing to necrosis. We reinforce the importance of early diagnosis to perform a suitable treatment and clinical follow-up to avoid ischemic secondary complications.

Experiencia argentina en la etapa final de erradicación de la polio: cambio de vacuna oral trivalente a bivalente / Argentinian experience to finish polio eradication: switch from trivalent to bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine

Entre el 17 de abril y el 1 de mayo de 2016, 155 países en todo el mundo cambiaron el uso de la vacuna oral trivalente, que protege contra los tres tipos de poliovirus (1, 2 y 3), por la vacuna oral bivalente, que protege contra los poliovirus tipo 1 y 3. Este cambio señala el mayor esfuerzocoordinado globalmente en la historia de las vacunas. En Argentina se realizó el pasado 29 de abril, con una intensa planificación previa y una posterior validación.

Internações sensíveis à atenção primária específicas de mulheres / Sensitive female-specific hospitalization in primary care

Objetivou-se analisar as internações por condições sensíveis à atenção primária (ICSAP) específicas em mulheres e os fatores que determinam ou influenciam a ocorrência dessas internações (fatores socioeconômicos, sociodemográficos e controle de saúde) por meio de um inquérito de morbidade hospitalar realizado com amostra de 429 mulheres internadas em hospitais conveniados ao Sistema Único de Saúde. O percentual de ICSAP foi 49,42% (n = 212), com destaque para as internações específicas do sexo feminino 19,35% (n = 83). Associaram ao risco de internar por CSAP: idade superior a 60 anos, baixa escolaridade, internação prévia, realização de controle regular de saúde, falta de vínculo com a Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) e ser gestante. As causas evidentes foram as condições relacionadas à gravidez, ao parto e ao puerpério e às inflamações nos órgãos pélvicos femininos. Os resultados sugerem falhas no atendimento ambulatorial que deveria ser oportuno e resolutivo no contexto da saúde da mulher.

The scope of this paper was to analyze female-specific sensitive hospitalization occurring in primary care conditions and factors that determine or affect the occurrence of such hospitalizations (social, economic and demographic factors; health control). Analysis was performed by surveys on hospital morbidity with a sample of 429 females attended in Unified Health System (SUS) contracted hospitals. The sensitive hospitalizations percentage in primary care reached 49.42% (n = 212), highlighting female-specific hospitalization at 19.35% (n = 83). Hospitalization risks comprised elderly people over sixty, low schooling, previous hospitalizations, normal health control, lack of association with the Family Health Strategy and pregnancy. Evident causes were related to conditions of pregnancy, childbirth, post-partum and inflammations of the female pelvic organs. Results suggested flaws in outpatient attendance that should be adequate and provide solutions in women’s health.

Seroprevalence of poliovirus antibodies among 7-month-old infants after 4 doses of oral polio vaccine in Sistan-va-Baluchestan, Islamic Republic of Iran

Despite high coverage rates of polio vaccine in the Islamic Republic of Iran, the seroconversion rates of infants may be inadequate. This study measured seroprevalence of antibodies against poliovirus serotypes 1 to 3 [PV1, PV2 and PV3] in 7-month-old infants who had received at least 4 doses of trivalent oral polio vaccine. A serosurvey was conducted in 2010 in rural areas of Chabahar, Sistan-va-Baluchestan province. Using cluster sampling, 72 eligible infants were tested for antibody against the 3 poliovirus serotypes according to WHO guidelines. Antibody titres >/= 1:10 were considered positive. The seropositive rates for antibody against PV1, PV2 and PV3 were 84.7%, 95.8% and 70.8% respectively. Only 63.9% of participants were seropositive for antibodies against all 3 poliovirus serotypes. Except for PV2, the seroprevalence of antibody against the other 2 poliovirus serotypes, especially PV3, was unsatisfactory

Nano-adjuvanted polio vaccine: preparation and characterization of chitosan and trimethylchitosan [TMC] nanoparticles loaded with inactivated polio virus and coated with sodium alginate

It is proposed that particulate antigens could better interact with the antigen presenting cells [APCs]. A fast, simple and scalable process for preparation of polymeric nanoparticles [NPs] is coating of charged antigenic particles, like viruses, with oppositely charged polymers. A second coating with a charged polymer could increase the stability and modify the immunomodulatory potentials of NPs. Negatively charged inactivated polio virus [IPV] was coated with cationic polymers, chitosan [CHT] and trimethylchitosan [TMC] by a simple incubation method. CHT: IPV and TMC: IPV NPs were coated by anionic polymer, sodium alginate [ALG]. Physical characteristics and stability of NPs were studied. Cytocompatibility of NPs was checked with MTT assay. DC maturation study was used for evaluation of the NPs potential in interaction with DCs. Among the various polymer to antigen ratios tested, the least size and PDI and the highest ZP was seen in TMC: IPV [2:1], CHT: IPV [2:1], ALG: TMC: IPV [2:2:1] and ALG: CHT: IPV [4:2:1]. The physical stability of TMC: IPV and CHT: IPV was preserved until 15 days. After an early de-association of some part of coated alginate, ALG: CHT: IPV and ALG: TMC: IPC NPs were stable until the end of study [25[th] day]. No one of the NPs formulations had a negative effect on cell viability. Compared with plain IPV, nanoparticulate IPV formulations failed to increase the expression of CD40 and CD86 markers of DCs. NPs prepared with simple and scalable method, had reasonable physical characteristics, stability and cytocompatibility and could be tested in vivo for their immunoadjuvant potential

Immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of inactivated polio vaccine / 中华预防医学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a boost dose of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) among children aged 18 months who had been administered with primary doses of IPV.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Form 2011 to 2012, a total of 97 children were enrolled in the present study who were vaccinated with IPV at 2, 3, 4 months of age and boosted with the same vaccine at 18 months of age. Anti-poliovirus neutralizing antibody titers in serum were measured before and after booster vaccination, geometric mean titers (GMT) and seroprotection rate were calculated. Adverse events occurring within 30 days after booster vaccination were observed, including pain, redness/swelling and induration at the injection site, fever, vomit, abnormal crying, drowsiness, loss of appetite, irritability, and all other physical discomfort and related medications were also recorded. A descriptive analysis was performed for the safety assessment.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Immunogenicity was assessed in 84 subjects. The pre-booster seropositivity rates of neutralizing antibody against poliovirus type 1, 2, 3 before booster were all 100% (84/84) and the corresponding GMT (95% CI) was 1: 148.5 (116.49-189.29) , 1: 237.68 (178.39-316.67) and 1: 231.87 (181.27-296.58) , respectively. The seropositivity rates of neutralizing antibody against the three types of poliovirus after booster were all 100% (84/84) and the corresponding GMT (95% CI) was 1: 1612.14 (1470.57-1767.34) , 1: 1854.92 (1715.83-2005.29) and 1: 1625.50 (1452.12-1819.58) , respectively. The pre-booster titer of neutralizing antibody against poliovirus type 1, 2, 3 mainly ranged 1: 128-1: 512, which accounted for 65% (55/84) , 55% (46/84) , 74% (62/84) in each type. After the booster immunization, titers of neutralizing antibody against type 1, 2, 3 were increased as subjects with titer ≥ 1: 1024 accounted for 94% (78/84) , 95% (80/84) , 92% (77/84) , respectively.Safety was evaluated in 96 subjects, of which 16 subjects reported adverse events with the rate of 17%. The observed local events were mainly tenderness 3% (3/96) , redness/swelling and induration were not reported. The systemic adverse events included loss of appetite (8%, 8/96) , irritability (8%, 8/96) , fever (7%, 7/96) , abnormal crying (6%, 6/96) , drowsiness (6%, 6/96) and vomit (1%, 1/96) . All reported adverse events were mild or moderate. All of the local events occurred in the day of vaccination and lasted for 1-2 days, while systemic events almost developed within 2 days after vaccination and last less than 3 days.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>IPV booster dose has good immunogenicity and safety profile, which provides effective protection against poliovirus.</p>

Safety of different sequential immunization schedules of inactivated poliovirus vaccine and oral poliovirus vaccine primary vaccination / 中华预防医学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate safety of different sequential immunization schedules of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) primary vaccination.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Infants of 2 months old (60-89 days) selected in Beijing, were assigned to four groups, 1 dose IPV plus 2 doses OPV (I-O-O), 2 doses IPV plus 1 dose OPV(I-I-O), 3 doses IPV (I-I-I), and 3 doses OPV (O-O-O), and were vaccinated at the age of 2, 3, 4 months, from 2009 to 2011. The frequencies of systemic as well as local injection site reactions after every dose were recorded and calculated. A total of 553 infants were enrolled in the study and 89 infants were quit, 1492 diseases were observed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The incidence of adverse events in I-O-O, I-I-O, I-I-I, O-O-O were 22.9% (94/410), 18.4% (60/327), 22.0% (78/354) and 17.7% (71/401) with no statistical differences (χ(2) = 4.84, P = 0.184). Dose 1 (22.7% (32/141)-35.3% (54/153) ) was more frequently than dose 2 and dose 3. No serious adverse events (SAE) were reported during the study. The incidence of systemic adverse reactions in I-O-O, I-I-O, I-I-I, O-O-O were 21.5% (88/410), 17.7% (58/327) , 20.1% (71/354) and 17.7% (71/401) with no statistical differences (χ(2) = 2.53, P = 0.472). Abnormal crying were the most frequency reactions (7.2% (29/401)-11.3% (37/327) ) in 4 groups. Rarely severe reactions were observed of abnormal crying, somnolence, irritability and mild or medium reactions occurred in other symptoms. Local adverse reactions such as injection site pain, scleroma and swelling were reported by 2.2% (5/229)-5.6% (22/393) ,0-0.9% (2/229) and 0-1.0% (4/393) in I-O-O,I-I-O and I-I-I, and most reactions were mild.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Three IPV immunization and IPV/OPV sequential immunization as well as three OPV immunization demonstrated safe.</p>

Hacia la erradicación de la poliomielitis: logros y retos en México

Desde la implementación de las estrategias globales de erradicación, la incidencia de parálisis poliomielítica ha disminuido dramáticamente. Cuatro estrategias han contribuido notablemente: a) Altas coberturas de inmunización con vacuna oral de polio (VOP), b) Inmunización suplementaria durante los Días Nacionales de Vacunación, c) Vigilancia epidemiológica efectiva de casos de parálisis flácida aguda (PFA), y d) Bloqueos vacunales en zonas de alto riesgo. Sólo quedan tres países polioendémicos, no obstante, cualquier país corre el riesgo potencial de importación del virus de algunas de estas áreas, de la liberación accidental del virus resguardado en laboratorios de diagnóstico clínico o investigación, o de la presencia de virus circulantes derivados de vacuna en el medio ambiente. Este documento pretende exponer los antecedentes históricos que hicieron posible la eliminación de la enfermedad en México, así como los retos para lograr un mundo libre de poliomielitis.

Since the strategies to eradicate polio were implemented, the incidence of paralytic polio has dropped dramatically. Four main strategies have greatly contributed: a) High immunization coverage rate with oral polio vaccine (OPV), b) Supplementary immunization activities during the National Immunizations Days c) An effective epidemiological surveillance system for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) and d) Intensified immunization activities in high risk areas. Three countries remain polio endemic, nevertheless, any country has a potential risk of the virus importation from one of these endemic areas; an accidental release of poliovirus from a research or clinical laboratory, or from having a circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus in the environment. The present document aims to provide an historical background that made possible the disease elimination in Mexico. Moreover, we discuss the challenges that every country needs to face in order to achieve a polio-free world.

Study of immunogenicity after primary vaccination by different sequential program of inactivated poliovirus vaccine and oral poliovirus vaccine / 中华预防医学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate immunogenicity after primary vaccination by different sequential program of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Children of 2 months old (60-89 days) selected in Beijing were assigned to 4 groups, 1 dose IPV plus 2 doses OPV (I-O-O, 122 children), 2 doses IPV plus 1 dose OPV(I-I-O, 103 children), 3 doses IPV (I-I-I, 114 children), and 3 doses OPV (O-O-O, 106 children), and were vaccinated at the age of 2, 3, 4 months. Polio neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 were tested and protective rates were calculated before the 1st dose, after the last dose, and after the 1st and 2nd dose of IPV.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>After the primary immunization, geometric mean titers (GMT) of polio neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 were 788.32, 738.42 and 631.17 in O-O-O group, 212.02, 262.30 and 537.52 in I-I-I group, 940.35, 929.72 and 940.35 in I-O-O group and 901.09, 1102.68 and 1110.12 in I-I-O group (F values were 47.71, 53.84, and 9.81 respectively, all P values<0.01). The protective rate of three types among each group was 98.1% (104/106)-100.0% and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After the 1(st) dose of IPV, the GMT were 18.88, 37.77, 24.64 and the protective rate was 82.6% (122/138)-96.4% (133/138); after the 2nd dose of IPV, GMT were 177.03, 168.25, 321.86 and the protective rate was 99.1% (108/109)-100.0% (109/109) in antibody types 1, 2 and 3, respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>GMT of polio neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus is higher after vaccination by sequential program of IPV and OPV than that by IPV or OPV 3-doses program. High level of protective rate after 2 doses of IPV in I-I-O group may lead to better protection from vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). Sequential program of IPV and OPV can be used to maintain high level of herd immunity and to prevent VAPP, and the I-I-O sequential program should be the first choice.</p>

Polio / Polio

Polio continúa endémica en: Nigeria, Afganistán Pakistán e India. La iniciativa global de erradicación de polio de la OMS estableció que para 2013 no debe haber ningún niño paralítico en el mundo por el virus salvaje o por el virus derivado de la vacuna. En esta revisión se describen ambas vacunas contra el polio, la oral y la inactivada, su inmunogenicidad, seguridad y las condiciones a cumplir por un paíspara que cambie su esquema de vacunación de polio oral a inactivada. La vacuna polio oral ha permitido la erradicación de la enfermedaden varios continentes incluyendo América; sin embargo conlleva riesgos, tales como polio paralítica asociada a vacuna (VAP-siglas en inglés-) y parálisis producida por polio virus derivado de la vacuna (VDP-siglas en inglés-). La Vacuna Polio Inactivada (VPI) es segura e inmunogénica, puede ser administrada en combinaciones vacunales. Para que un país cambie a VPI debe tener cobertura y esquemaóptimo de esta vacuna, 90% de, cobertura de DTP3, vigilancia adecuada de parálisis flácida, no estar próximo en la actualidad o recientemente a un país con polio endémico. Altas coberturas vacunales son esenciales par asegurar una inmunidad adecuada de lapoblación

Polio remains endemic in Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India. Strategic plan of Global Poliomyelitis Eradication Initiative (GPEI) of the WHO is that by 2013 no child will be paralyzed by a wild or vaccine derived poliovirus. This paper describes both oral and inactivated vaccine, safety concerns with the use of OPV, immunogenicity of IPV and the conditions to be full filled in order for a country to deliverIPV as a regular vaccine schedule. Oral polio vaccine has successfully contributed to global polio eradication in several continents including America. However, it carries risks, such as Vaccine Derived Poliovirus (VDP) and Vaccine Associated Paralytic Polio (VAPP). Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine (IPV) is safe and immunogenic; it may be administered as monovalent or in a combined shot. Countries opting to switch from OPV to IPV should have: optimal IPV coverage and schedule, 90% of DTP 3 coverage, good surveillance of flaccid paralysis cases, and should not be near a country with endemic polio recently or at the present time. Are neither currently or were notrecently polio endemic nor has close contacts with such areas. High immunization coverage is essential to ensure adequate populationimmunity